Treść głównego artykułu

Abstrakt

W artykule dokonano zdefiniowania pojęcia bezpieczeństwo międzynarodowew ujęciu teorii konstruktywistycznej. Przedstawiono w nim główne spory dotyczące pojmowania bezpieczeństwa, roli aktorów w kreowaniu ładu pokojowego, mechanizmów łączących poszczególne podmioty oraz możliwości ich oddziaływania na procesy bezpieczeństwa. Autor dokonuje również oceny możliwości oraz pułapek, jakie stawia przed badaczem stosowanie teorii konstruktywizmu do badań nad problematyką bezpieczeństwa.

Słowa kluczowe

bezpieczeństwo międzynarodowe teoria konstruktywistyczna

Szczegóły artykułu

Jak cytować
Czywilis, D. (2019). Pojęcie bezpieczeństwa międzynarodowego w ujęciu teorii konstruktywizmu. Rocznik Bezpieczeństwa Międzynarodowego, 2, 267–268. https://doi.org/10.34862/rbm.2007.20

Bibliografia

  1. Acharya, A., Will Asia’s Past Be Its Future?, [w:] International Security, tom 28, nr 2, zima 2003/2004.
  2. Berger, P.L., Luckmann, T., Th e Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Oxford 1966.
  3. Blair, T., Shackled In Th e War On Terror, Sunday Times, dn. 27.05.2007.
  4. Buzan, B., Kelstrup, M., Lemaitre, P., Tromer, E., Wæver, O., Th e European Security Order Recast: Scenarios for the Post-Cold War Era, Londyn 1990.
  5. Buzan, B., Jones, C., Little, R., Th e Logic of Anarchy: Neorealism to Structural Realism, Co-lumbia University Press, Nowy Jork 1993.
  6. Buzan, B., Wæver, O., Regions and Powers: Th e Structure of International Security, Cambrid-ge University Press, 2003.
  7. Buzan, B., Wæver, O., de Wilde, J., Security. A New Framework For Analysis, Boulder, Lon-dyn 1998.
  8. Conteh -Morgan, E., Peacebuilding and Human Security: A Constructivist Perspective, [w:] International Journal of Peace Studies, t. 10, nr 1, wiosna / lato 2005.
  9. Copeland, D. C., Th e Constructivist Challenge to Structural Realism: A Review Essay, [w:] International Security, tom 25, nr 2, jesień 2000.
  10. Cziomer, E., Zyblikiewicz, L., Zarys współczesnych stosunków międzynarodowych, Warsza-wa 2005.
  11. De Zeeuw, G., Constructivism: A ‘Next’ Area of Scientifi c Development?, [w:] Foundations of Science, t. 6, nr. 1–3 / 2001.
  12. Donaj, Ł., Pojęcie bezpieczeństwa – bezpieczeństwo narodowe i międzynarodowe, [w:] W. Malendowski (red.), Świat u progu XXI wieku – wybrane problemy, Poznań 2003.
  13. Fine, A., Science Made Up: Constructivist Sociology of Scientifi c Knowledge, [w:] Galison P., Stump, D. (red.), The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, and Power, Stanford University Press, 1996.
  14. Giddens, A., Central problems in Social Th eory : Action, Structure and Contradiction in Social Analysis, MacMillan, Londyn 1979.Th e Globalization and the World Politics: an Introduction to International Relations, red. J. Baylis, S. Smith, Oxford University Press 2006.
  15. Haack, M., Collective Security in Asia, [w:] FES Briefi ng Papers, maj 2004.
  16. Huntington, S., Th e Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order, Touchstone Books, Londyn–Nowy Jork 1996.
  17. Jepperson, R.L., Wendt, A., Katzenstein, P.J., Norms, Identity, and Culture in National Security,Th e Culture of National Security, red.: Katzenstein, P.J., Columbia University Press, Nowy Jork 1996.
  18. Jervis, R., System Eff ects: Complexity in Political and Social Life, Princeton University Press, 1997.
  19. D.C., Getting Asia Wrong: Th e Need for New Analytical Frameworks, [w:] International Security, t. 27, nr 3, wiosna 2003.
  20. Keohane, R., Nye, J., Power and Interdependence in the Information Age, [w:] Foreign Affairs, t. 77 nr 5, wrzesień/październik 1998.
  21. Kratochwil, F., International Order and Foreign Policy, Boulder, 1978.
  22. Kratochwil, F., How Do Norms Matter?, [w:] Byers, M. (red.), Th e Role of Law in International Politics, Oxford University Press 2000.
  23. Kratochwil, F., Religion and (Inter -) National Politics: On Th e Heuristics of Identities, Structures and Agents, [w:] Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, nr 30, 2005.
  24. Kukułka, J., Bezpieczeństwo a współpraca europejska: współzależności i sprzeczności, [w:] Sprawy Międzynarodowe 7/1987.
  25. Laursen, H.H., Reflections on the Philosophy of Science beyond Realism and Constructivism, [w:] Nordic Journal of Philosophy, t. 3, nr 1/2002.
  26. Mäkinen, K., Strategic Security: A Constructivist Investigation of Critical Security and Strategic Organisational Learning Issues Towards a Th eory of Security Development, ACIE Helsinki 2005.
  27. Miller, J.H., Changing Japanese Attitude Towards Security, [w:] Limaye, S.P. (red.), Domestic Determinants and Security Policy Making In East Asia, Matsuda, Y., APCSS, 2000.
  28. Neumann, I.B., Wæver, O., Th e Future of International Relations: Masters in the Making?, Routledge, NowyJork, 1997.
  29. Onuf, N., Constructivism: A User’s Manual, [w:] P. Kowert, V. Kubalkova, N. Onuf, International Relations in a Constructed World, M.E. Sharpe, Nowy Jork–Londyn, 1998.
  30. Ruggie, J.G., What Makes the World Hang Together? Neo–utilitarianism and the Social Constructivist Challenge, [w:] International Organization, 52/4, jesień 1998.
  31. Tan S. S., HumanSecurity: Discourse, Statecraft , Emancipation,Institute of Defence and Strategic Studies, Singapur 2001.
  32. Taureck, R., Securitization Theory and Securitization Studies, [w:] Journal of International Relations and Development 9 / 2006.
  33. Waltz, K. N., Theory of International Politics, McGraw -Hill, Nowy Jork, 1979.
  34. Wæver, O., Peace and Security: Two Concepts and Th eir Relationship, [w:] S. Guzzini, D. Jung, Contemporary Security Analysis and Copenhagen Peace Research, Routledge, Nowy Jork 2004.
  35. Wendt, A., Anarchy Is What States make of It, [w:] International Relations, 46 (2), wiosna 1992.
  36. Wendt, A., Social Th eory of International Politics, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
  37. Wendt, A., Why A World State Is Inevitable: Teleology and the Logic of Anarchy,[w:] Europe-anJournal of International Relations, 9 (4)/2003.
  38. Wendt, A., Social Theory As Cartesian Science: An Auto – Critique From A Quantum Perspective, [w:] Guzzini, S. (red.), Constructivism and International Relations, Leander, A., Routledge, Nowy Jork 2005.
  39. Zehfuss, M., Constructivism in International Sciences: The Politics of Reality, Cambridge University Press, 2002.
  40. Zięba R., Kategoria bezpieczeństwa w nauce o stosunkach międzynarodowych, [w:] D. Bobrow, E. Haliżak, R. Zięba (red.,), Bezpieczeństwo Narodowe i Międzynarodowe u Schył-ku XX w., Warszawa 1997.
  41. Źródła elektroniczne
  42. Bandoro, B., ASEAN and Collective Security System, http://www.csis.or.id/scholars_opi-nion_view.asp?op_id=296&id=40&tab=3, 14.07.2007.
  43. Dibb, P., No collective security: Peace looks fragile in Asia, http://www.iht.com/artic-les/2002/06/19/edpaul_ed3_.php, 15.07.2007.
  44. Domosławski A., Judt T., Użyteczni idioci Ameryki, http://www.gazetawyborcza.pl/1,76842,4178327.html, 29.05.2007.
  45. Foreign Terrorists Organization List, Offi ce of Counterterrorism, U.S. Department of State, http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/fs/37191.htm, 12.07.07 i http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/fs/2002/12535.htm, 12.07.07.
  46. Mercel, V., The Constructivist Debate; Bringing Hermeneutics (Properly) In, http://www.isa-net.org/archive/isa01.pdf, 27.06.2007.
  47. Regional Separatist Movements: Implications for Malaysian Security, http://mpat.mod.gov.my/CYBERLIBSDATA/MEDIAS/ARTICLE/815.pdf, dn. 16.07.2007.
  48. Smith, S.A., Japan’s Future Strategic Options and the US – Japan Alliance, [w:] Security Context, The US – Japan Alliance, Extended Deterrence, and Regional Factors, www.stimson.org/japan/pdf/JNO -Security_Context.pdf, 10.07.2007.
  49. Zlobin, N., America Could Lose Its Superpower Status, http://www.cdi.org/russia/johnson/7011 -19.cfm, 13.07.2007.